Journal · October 16, 2026

The Field of Consciousness: What If We're Only Beginning to Understand?

By Marybeth Jordan

I've been listening to The Telepathy Tapes, and it's brought me back to something I've contemplated for years through yoga, meditation, and sound healing: What if consciousness isn't something that exists only inside our brains? What if we're participating in something much larger?

We understand so much about the physical world, yet there is still so much we cannot explain. We accept gravity, magnetic fields, radio waves, and frequencies we cannot see. We know they're real because we can measure their effects.

And yet, when we begin talking about consciousness as a field, something that might extend beyond the individual mind, we enter territory that science hasn't fully mapped.

That doesn't make it true. But does it mean we should stop asking questions?

The Hydrogen Atom and the Invisible World

One of the things I find fascinating is how magnetic resonance imaging works.

Hydrogen atoms are everywhere in our bodies. Their nuclei behave like tiny magnets. When placed inside a powerful magnetic field, they precess, or wobble, at a particular frequency known as the Larmor frequency.

Physicists understand this beautifully.

By introducing radiofrequency pulses and measuring the signals produced as those nuclei respond and relax, MRI technology can reconstruct detailed images of the inside of our bodies.

Think about that for a moment.

Something invisible, behaving according to the laws of magnetism and frequency, can give us an image of something we couldn't otherwise see.

The body was always there. The information was always available through its physical properties. We simply needed to develop the technology to detect and interpret it.

And that makes me wonder: What else exists that we haven't yet learned how to detect?

Sound Healing and the Body That Listens

This brings me to sound healing.

When we sit with singing bowls, chanting, humming, or the vibration of a gong, something happens. Sometimes we feel ourselves soften. Our breathing slows. Our nervous system settles. We may feel emotions rise that we didn't even realize we were carrying.

There are physiological explanations for some of this. Sound engages our auditory system, influences attention and emotion, and can support relaxation. Slow breathing and vocalization can also affect autonomic regulation.

But I also wonder about the experience beyond what we can currently measure.

Why can a sound sometimes feel as though it reaches a place within us that words cannot?

We are physical beings, responsive to vibration. But we are also conscious beings, experiencing that vibration through memory, emotion, sensation, and awareness.

Perhaps the beauty of sound healing is not that it proves some mysterious energy is moving through us, but that it reminds us how deeply interconnected our physical and subjective experiences really are. In The Telepathy Tapes, a little boy tells his teacher that one tuning fork is the sound of his body (the same frequency), and another is the sound of his soul, and that she is there to help him merge them!

The Telepathy Tapes and the Possibility of More

The Telepathy Tapes explores extraordinary claims about communication and consciousness, particularly involving nonspeaking autistic individuals.

These accounts are compelling, and they deserve both compassion and rigorous scientific examination. The claims of telepathy have not been established through independently replicated, well-controlled research.

Still, the larger questions intrigue me.

Is consciousness entirely produced by the brain? Is it an emergent property of physical processes? Or could the brain somehow participate in a reality that our present understanding doesn't yet encompass?

Some people describe this possibility as a field of consciousness, something not confined to an individual body.

It's an intriguing hypothesis, not an established scientific field like electromagnetism. We don't currently have evidence that consciousness operates through a shared external field.

But the question itself feels worthy of exploration.

The Ancient Yogis Were Asking Questions, Too

Long before modern neuroscience, yogic traditions were investigating the nature of awareness.

In Samkhya philosophy, Purusha represents pure awareness, while Prakriti represents the changing world of matter, energy, mind, and experience.

In some nondual traditions, consciousness is understood not as something we individually possess, but as the fundamental reality in which experience arises.

And then there's Spanda (SPUN-duh), the subtle pulse or movement of consciousness described in Kashmir Shaivism. This is the theme we worked with all week; if you were at any of my classes, you'll recognize the term.

Not vibration in the measurable acoustic sense, but a metaphorical or metaphysical pulsation of awareness itself.

I find the parallels fascinating, even though ancient philosophical ideas and modern physics are not interchangeable.

Perhaps the yogis were exploring through direct experience what scientists explore through instruments: different ways of asking what reality is and how we participate in it.

What If Our Instruments Are Still Too Limited?

There was a time when we couldn't image the inside of a living human body. We couldn't detect gravitational waves. We couldn't see distant galaxies with the clarity we can today.

The limits of our instruments were not necessarily the limits of reality.

But I think it's equally important to remember that the existence of one invisible, measurable phenomenon doesn't prove the existence of another. In his book An Immense World, Ed Yong describes how different animals have different senses depending on their survival needs. Ours just happen to be five, but other species have more or fewer, and quite different ones. Think of bats and sonar.

MRI doesn't prove telepathy. Quantum physics doesn't establish a universal consciousness. And the emotional power of sound doesn't necessarily mean we're accessing another dimension.

What these things do, at least for me, is inspire curiosity.

Maybe consciousness is entirely biological. Maybe there's something more. Maybe our language is inadequate for describing what we experience in meditation, in connection with another human being, or in those moments when the boundary between ourselves and the world seems to dissolve.

I don't need to claim certainty.

In fact, I think the willingness to remain uncertain is part of the practice.

Living in the Question

Yoga has taught me that I don't need to understand everything intellectually to remain curious about my experience.

I can sit in meditation and observe awareness without knowing precisely where it comes from.

I can feel the resonance of a singing bowl without claiming that it has healed me on a cellular level.

I can listen to extraordinary stories about consciousness without immediately accepting or dismissing them.

Maybe there are aspects of reality that our current science hasn't discovered. Maybe some of our most beautiful spiritual explanations will eventually turn out to be metaphors for biological processes.

Either way, the mystery remains extraordinary.

What if the most important thing isn't proving that we're connected through some invisible field, but becoming more aware of the connection we already experience?

To one another. To nature. To sound. To the changing world around us.

And perhaps to something we don't yet have the words to describe.

For now, I'm comfortable remaining curious.

Not knowing isn't the absence of wisdom.

Sometimes, it's where wisdom begins.

← All journal posts